OPINION: Ethical Local Language Translation: A Tool for Peaceful Elections in Nigeria
0
0
OPINION: Ethical Local Language Translation: A Tool for Peaceful Elections in Nigeria
By Olanrewaju Oyedeji
Nigeria’s electoral process is shaped not only by political competition, campaign promises and the activities of political parties but also by how information reaches citizens across different linguistic and cultural communities. In a country with more than 500 indigenous languages, the ability to communicate electoral information in languages voters understand is essential to strengthening democratic participation, preventing misinformation and promoting peaceful elections.
In Kano during the FactCheck Africa workshop on local languages translation for newsrooms towards the 2027 election, one thing was clear, there is a need to be responsible while translating.
It was also clear that , translating political and electoral messages into local languages must go beyond simply converting words from English into Hausa, Yoruba, Igbo or other indigenous languages. It requires accuracy, fairness, cultural sensitivity and a strong commitment to ethical communication.
READ ALSO: TMV Praises FG Over Disbursement of N13.87bn Pension Arrears to 18,822 Retirees
When handled responsibly, local language translation can become an important instrument for reducing political tensions and preventing electoral violence. People identify a lot with their roots, truthfully too, there are many persons in our local communities who rely on these translation to make important voting decisions.
Elections are often characterised by intense political rivalries, competing narratives and attempts by political actors to influence public opinion. In such an environment, language can either promote understanding or deepen divisions. Misleading translations, inflammatory expressions and deliberately distorted political messages can provoke hostility.
It can also in a large way reinforce ethnic suspicions and encourage communities to view political opponents as enemies.
The danger is particularly significant in communities where many citizens depend on local radio stations, community announcements, religious gatherings and informal communication networks for political information. Where electoral information is not available in languages familiar to these audiences, citizens may become more vulnerable to rumours, fabricated claims and manipulative political narratives.
Ethical translation therefore plays a critical role in ensuring that voters receive accurate information about the electoral process. Information concerning voter registration, collection of Permanent Voter Cards, polling procedures, election dates, accreditation and voting requirements should be communicated in languages that citizens can understand. This helps reduce confusion, limits the circulation of false information and enables voters to make informed decisions.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), political parties, civil society organisations and media institutions have important responsibilities in this regard. They must recognise that effective electoral communication cannot be restricted to English-language publications, press statements and social media messages. Reaching citizens in their preferred languages is necessary for inclusive democratic participation.
However, the process of translation must be guided by clear ethical standards. Translators should preserve the original meaning and context of political statements without introducing personal opinions, exaggerations or expressions that were not contained in the original message. A statement criticising a government policy, for instance, should not be translated in a manner that portrays an entire ethnic or religious community as responsible for the policy’s failures.
Similarly, political expressions that are controversial in English may carry stronger or entirely different meanings when translated into indigenous languages. Translators must understand these cultural and linguistic differences to avoid unintentionally introducing offensive, discriminatory or inflammatory meanings into public communication.
This responsibility becomes even more important during election campaigns, when political actors sometimes exploit ethnic, religious and regional identities to mobilise support. A poorly translated campaign message can transform political disagreement into communal hostility. Deliberately distorted translations can be even more dangerous, particularly when circulated through WhatsApp groups, Facebook, TikTok and community radio platforms.
Ethical translation must therefore be independent of political interests. Translators should not alter messages to favour particular candidates, political parties or interests. Their responsibility is to communicate what was actually said, not what political actors want audiences to believe was said.
Where a statement is ambiguous, translators should seek clarification rather than introduce assumptions. Where an original statement contains offensive or discriminatory language, the translation should not conceal its meaning, but its presentation must provide sufficient context to prevent unnecessary distortion. Accuracy and accountability should remain central to the process.
The media also has a significant role in promoting responsible multilingual communication. Journalists and editors working with local language content must verify translations, attribute statements correctly and avoid publishing sensational interpretations that could inflame tensions. Media organisations should engage competent translators and local language experts, particularly when reporting sensitive political developments involving ethnic, religious or regional identities.
Community radio stations, which remain important sources of information in many rural communities, can also support peaceful elections by providing accurate electoral education and creating platforms for constructive political discussions in indigenous languages. Such programmes can explain electoral rules, address rumours, encourage tolerance and remind citizens that political differences should not translate into violence.
Furthermore, civil society organisations and fact-checking groups should invest in multilingual fact-checking initiatives. False claims should be identified and debunked in the same languages in which they circulate. Fact-checking messages published exclusively in English may fail to reach the very communities targeted by misinformation. Translating verified corrections into local languages can help prevent false narratives from gaining acceptance and spreading across communities.
There is also a need to strengthen the capacity of local language translators through training in electoral reporting, conflict-sensitive communication, media ethics and fact-checking. Translation should not be treated as an informal activity that anyone with basic knowledge of a language can undertake. Electoral communication requires an understanding of context, political terminology, cultural sensitivities and the possible consequences of particular expressions.
Ultimately, peaceful elections depend not only on credible electoral institutions and responsible political leadership but also on citizens having access to reliable information. Language should not become a barrier to democratic participation or a weapon for manipulating communities.
Nigeria’s linguistic diversity should be recognised as an opportunity to strengthen democracy rather than a weakness that political actors can exploit. Ethical local language translation can bridge communication gaps, promote informed participation, discourage misinformation and encourage citizens to engage with political differences peacefully.
As the country prepares for future elections, stakeholders must move beyond treating indigenous language communication as an optional addition to electoral campaigns and voter education. It should be recognised as an essential component of democratic inclusion and conflict prevention.
The objective is not simply to make political messages understandable in different languages, but to ensure that they remain truthful, fair and responsible in the process. When information is translated with accuracy, integrity and cultural sensitivity, language becomes more than a means of communication; it becomes a tool for building trust, protecting democratic participation and promoting peaceful elections.
