Stolen UBEC Grant: Group Demands Probe of ex-Kwara Gov Fatah Ahmed

0 0
Read Time:1 Minute, 48 Second

Stolen UBEC Grant: Group Demands Probe of ex-Kwara Gov Fatah Ahmed

By Kaosara Oladimeji Olayemi

Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq has been challenged by the Elites Network for Sustainable Development (ENetSuD), an anti-corruption civil society organisation, to immediately prosecute ex-Governor AbdulFatah Ahmed’s administration over claims of stolen UBEC grant.

The group said the persistent allegation by Governor AbdulRahman (since 2019) that the previous administration stole the UBEC grant is weighty and criminal in nature, hence the need for the prosecution if his allegation is credible and valid.

The charge was contained in a statement signed and released by the Press Secretary of the group, Saeed Tijjani and obtained by INCNews247 on Tuesday.

It added that the allegation should not end on social media or the pages of the newspaper.

READ ALSO: KWASU Lecturer in Trouble for Luring Student into His Bedroom for Exams

The body, through its Coordinator Dr Abdullateef Alagbonsi, reminded the Governor that he has the constitutional duty to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power in line with section 15 (5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

The statement urged the Governor not to further waste any time over the criminal allegation of embezzlement of public fund, and should immediately direct the Attorney General of the State to prosecute the alleged looters, if truly they committed the alleged stealing of public funds.

ENetSuD added that in order not to see the statement of the Governor as a mere political allegation, the Governor should initiate prosecution against all those (members of the past administration) involved in the alleged stealing of the UBEC grant.

ENetSuD assumed that an incumbent Governor has access to records and books of spending by the past administration, and his declaration that the past administration stole public funds is expectedly guided with fact and empirical evidence that members of the public can rely on.

The body advised that prosecution of the looters in the public interest will serve the public (and taxpayers) better than perpetual allegations in the media without any action to recover such funds, especially now that the alleged looters have no immunity stopping them from being prosecuted.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *